Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:11
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
The latest on the Knicks' coaching search and their interest in Jason Kidd - Marc Stein | Substack
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New COVID variant is spreading. Don’t underestimate it, experts say. - NJ.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Inflation Expectations Decline; Labor Market Expectations Improve - Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Wake Forest baseball coach apologizes for homophobic slur caught on camera - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The Switch 2’s promising start hides an uncertain future - The Verge
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years: